Hi and sorry for the late replyNo , it's not a tricky question I want to 
understand how the counts are calculated , if I entered a larger password will 
it really matters?

Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 03:09:26 -0700
From: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] QoS
To: [email protected]; [email protected]

Is this a trick question ?

Every time it sees a packet that matches the criteria you have specified and is 
put into your class it increments the "packets" counter by 1 and adds the size 
of the packet to the "bytes" counter.

What is or isn't happening that you're concerned about ?



regards,
Tony.



        From: M K <[email protected]>
 To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> 
 Sent: Tuesday, 23 July 2013 8:10 PM
 Subject: [c-nsp] QoS
   
Hi allI have configured QoS between two sites across my backbone , the 
classification was done based on telnet traffic and the marking was done based 
on the precedence valueI have configured to mark all telnet traffic with 
precedence value of 3 and I received it fine without any issues
Now my question is as belowWhen I first wrote telnet 7.7.7.7 and checked the 
output of show policy-map interface fastEthernet 1/0 | inc Class|packet
telnet 7.7.7.7    Class-map: PRECEDENCE_3 (match-all)        9 packets, 520 
bytesUsername : cisco    Class-map: PRECEDENCE_3 (match-all)        16 packets, 
905
 bytesPassword : cisco    Class-map: PRECEDENCE_3 (match-all)        23 
packets, 1290 bytesR7>exit    Class-map: PRECEDENCE_3 (match-all)        30 
packets, 1674 bytes
I want to know what is the methodology used to count these numbers ?
Thanks


                           
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


     
                                          
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to