On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 1:52 AM, Mark Tinka <[email protected]> wrote:
> Traditionally, "aggressive" IGP timers in conjunction with > BFD have been such that convergence happens as soon as BFD > signals its client (the IGP, in this case) of an issue on > the link. > Mark. > I don't want to confuse aggressive IGP hellos with aggressive IGP protocol tuning. I'm all for tuning SPF, et al. timers under the protocol. It's the only way you get fast convergence. My beef is with sub-second hellos, which BFD does a better job of. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
