On Thursday, August 29, 2013 03:54:47 PM Pete Lumbis wrote: > I don't want to confuse aggressive IGP hellos with > aggressive IGP protocol tuning. I'm all for tuning SPF, > et al. timers under the protocol. It's the only way you > get fast convergence. My beef is with sub-second hellos, > which BFD does a better job of.
Yes, agree - BFD takes care of the Hellos. Any thoughts of dumping BFD in favour of (r)LFA? Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
