On Aug 29, 2013, at 12:05 PM, Antoine Monnier wrote: > Hi Tony, > > My company is considering buying some ASR1002 instead of ASR1001 though I > have not understood the reasoning behind it yet (too good Cisco sales guy?). > Could you give me more details on why you would stay away from systems with > RP1 such as the 1002? That could give me some munition to root for the > ASR1001. (I have used it at a previous job and liked that little box).
Split the difference and get a 1002-X. > > Thanks. > > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 5:38 PM, Tony Varriale <[email protected]>wrote: > >> On 8/29/2013 9:12 AM, Mark Tinka wrote: >> >>> Same here - the RP2 in the ASR1001 will scale well when you >>> run as many full feeds as you want. >>> >> It's not an RP2...more of a RP2 lite :) Also note the memory restriction >> on the 1001 compared to a RP2 system. >> >> As a general thought, stay away from RP1 systems (such as a 1002). >> >> >>> I'd go with 2x units if all you need is a handful of Gig-E >>> ports and no SONET/SDH or other non-Ethernet requirements. >>> >> This +1. >> >> tv >> >> >> ______________________________**_________________ >> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >> https://puck.nether.net/**mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp<https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp> >> archive at >> http://puck.nether.net/**pipermail/cisco-nsp/<http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/> >> > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
