Thanks to everyone for the responses - Very helpful! So, the consensus is that if we are wanting to take more than a couple of full bgp tables and also do netflow, 6500/7600 is not an option?
We should be looking at either a pair of asr1001's (With 16G memory), or a single ASR1006 with dual RP2's etc? Cheers. > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 18:58:17 +1030 > Subject: [c-nsp] 6500, 7600 or ASR > > Hi Guys, > > Have the following requirements: > > · > Minimum of 1Gbps routing performance with traffic shaping, ACLs, etc > enabled > > > · > 2 full BGP tables initially with option to expand to 4 or more > > > · > Fully redundant, dual power, dual supervisor, multiple line cards for > redundancy > > > · > Netflow > > Keen to hear thoughts on which platform would be the best choice? (Have not > touched the 6500's or 7600's, so am leaning towards asr1006?)...but > potentially the 7600's or 6500's would be a cheaper alternative? > Cheers. > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
