On 10/07/2013 05:30 AM, Pete Lumbis wrote: > If we fix the behavior what does the fix look like? Do we not allow any > reason that starts with "i"(in) "c" (cancel) or "a"(at)? But then what if > you want a reload reason of "reload installing new software"? Should this > be blocked?
Create "reload reason blahblah" and deprecate "reload blahblah". Issue a warning each time "reload blahblah" happens. Also have different confirmation messages. "Reload in 10" could have "Proceed with reload in 10?" while the other could be "Proceed with immediate reload?" _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
