Wait a minute... My router supports "reload reason" already and rejects "reload int 10".
Check later IOS versions. On 10/07/2013 12:05 PM, Pete Lumbis wrote: > The two outputs do have different warnings: > > reload reason: > =========================== > Router#reload > Proceed with reload? [confirm] > =========================== > > =========================== > Router#reload in 5 > Reload scheduled in 5 minutes by console > Reload reason: Reload Command > Proceed with reload? [confirm] > =========================== > > > > On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Octavio Alvarez > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > On 10/07/2013 05:30 AM, Pete Lumbis wrote: > > If we fix the behavior what does the fix look like? Do we not > allow any > > reason that starts with "i"(in) "c" (cancel) or "a"(at)? But then > what if > > you want a reload reason of "reload installing new software"? > Should this > > be blocked? > > Create "reload reason blahblah" and deprecate "reload blahblah". Issue a > warning each time "reload blahblah" happens. > > Also have different confirmation messages. "Reload in 10" could have > "Proceed with reload in 10?" while the other could be "Proceed with > immediate reload?" > > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
