let me ask you this first ,is the destination 192.0.2.6 is a loopback on Core-2 or its a different physical device attached behind Core-2 ? If its a loopback on core-2 then i would suggest to put a different router attached to core-2 for accurate testing .
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 1:40 AM, Peter Rathlev <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 2013-10-15 at 17:29 -0600, dip wrote: > > you should be able to see the configs with the help of "show derived > > config interface Tu65336" > > Ooh, I didn't know that command. Very nice. :-) > > interface Tunnel65336 > ip unnumbered Loopback0 > no ip redirects > no logging event link-status > mpls ip > tunnel mode mpls traffic-eng > tunnel destination 10.85.248.34 > tunnel mpls traffic-eng autoroute announce > tunnel mpls traffic-eng path-option 1 explicit name > __dynamic_tunnel65336 > tunnel mpls traffic-eng fast-reroute > no routing dynamic > end > > > , one thing you would notice is that they > > are created with explicit path option not dynamic path option and > > thats why you see that its not following shortest path based on your > > IGP metric.Though it will detect that there is a better path > > Yup. > > dist-1#sh ip explicit-paths name __dynamic_tunnel65336 > PATH __dynamic_tunnel65336 (strict source route, path complete, > generation 58, status non-configured) > 1: next-address 198.51.100.222 > dist-1# > dist-1#show ip route 192.51.100.222 > Routing entry for 198.51.100.222/32 > Known via "connected", distance 0, metric 0 (connected) > Routing Descriptor Blocks: > * directly connected, via TenGigabitEthernet5/4 > Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1 > dist-1# > > Strangely (to me at least) is that the explicit path "next-address" is > actually the local address of the (wrong) interface, not the remote > address. > > dist-1#show ip interface brief Te5/4 > Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status > Protocol > TenGigabitEthernet5/4 198.51.100.222 YES NVRAM up > up > dist-1# > > I still don't understand why it would select this path and not the one > with the lowest cost. > > > ..So if > > you do "show mpls traffic-eng tunnels tunnel XYZ" , it should tell you > > the shortest unconstrained Path which is probably what you want it to > > follow . > > It does exactly tell my that. Is there any way to make it use this? :-) > > -- > Peter > > > > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
