I set all my mpls interfaces to.... 9216 - ios xr (9k's) 9202 - ios (901's, 3600's)
Aaron -----Original Message----- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mack McBride Sent: Friday, October 25, 2013 4:01 PM To: Nick Hilliard; Eric A Louie; Cisco NSP Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Best practice, MPLS and MTU settings I concur with 9100. Which providers have you run into problems with 9100? I know certain cisco gear doesn't support packets that big for certain links. The 3750/3560 series for example only support 9000 on gigabit interfaces and much smaller on 10/100 ports. LR Mack McBride Network Architect -----Original Message----- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Nick Hilliard Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2013 8:40 PM To: Eric A Louie; Cisco NSP Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Best practice, MPLS and MTU settings On 25/10/2013 09:32, Eric A Louie wrote: > If you used the method of increasing the MTU, what value did you use? I aim towards a 9100 byte ip mtu, in order to guarantee a 9000 byte MTU for customers with plenty of overhead on our side. Sometimes this isn't possible due to third party provider core link restrictions. Nick _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
