On Friday, November 15, 2013 02:56:39 PM Tony Tauber wrote: > Depending on your OS, you may have to explicitly disable > v6 routes being sent over a v4 session. > That's possible to do but I don't know why one would want > to in a truly dual-stack deployment. > In v6 the only "v4 artifact" will be that the router ID > is still a 32-bit number which is most commonly set to > the v4 loopback or some such.
This has been discussed a few times on this list. Some operators do it, others don't. I don't - I prefer to have my address families running over their own native transport. Some might see it as double work, but it's peace of mind and still looks neat :-). Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
