So how do you keep IPv6 off of IPv4? if you are running dual stack shouldn't it just go out it's native protocol?
Scott On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 6:42 AM, Mark Tinka <[email protected]> wrote: > On Friday, November 15, 2013 02:56:39 PM Tony Tauber wrote: > > > Depending on your OS, you may have to explicitly disable > > v6 routes being sent over a v4 session. > > That's possible to do but I don't know why one would want > > to in a truly dual-stack deployment. > > In v6 the only "v4 artifact" will be that the router ID > > is still a 32-bit number which is most commonly set to > > the v4 loopback or some such. > > This has been discussed a few times on this list. > > Some operators do it, others don't. > > I don't - I prefer to have my address families running over > their own native transport. Some might see it as double > work, but it's peace of mind and still looks neat :-). > > Mark. > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
