Any chance some of you have further insight on this issue? Still not having any luck.
Thanks, db On Nov 22, 2013, at 11:52 AM, Peter Persson wrote: > Just curios... > Why are you using a 6500 firm for a 7600? > > > 2013/11/22 Dan Benson <[email protected]> > All, > > >From reading it seems the 7600 does not support NAT in vrf (without an FWSM) > >but I thought I would ask the question. I have two interfaces in the same > >VRF (inside and outside) and I am able to static translate inbound but I am > >unable to overload with TCP and udp packets. ICMP packets traverse the > >interfaces but nothing else. Will this work if I don’t have the VRF? > > I am running s72033-adventerprisek9-mz.151-1.SY.bin. > > Thanks in advance for your insight. > > db > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
