The question is will basic NAT overload work without VRFs on SX code? Yes, given the endless list of 6k NAT limitations.
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Dan Benson <[email protected]> wrote: > All, > > From reading it seems the 7600 does not support NAT in vrf (without an > FWSM) but I thought I would ask the question. I have two interfaces in the > same VRF (inside and outside) and I am able to static translate inbound but > I am unable to overload with TCP and udp packets. ICMP packets traverse the > interfaces but nothing else. Will this work if I don’t have the VRF? > > I am running s72033-adventerprisek9-mz.151-1.SY.bin. > > Thanks in advance for your insight. > > db > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
