On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 7:08 PM, Dobbins, Roland <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Nov 30, 2013, at 11:45 PM, [email protected] wrote: > > > The above spec could apply to juniper, cisco, hp, xtreme ...etc, any > > recommendation should I add/adjust to my TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION > > It's hard for strangers who don't know your actual requirements to make > recommendations, beyond generalities like good NetFlow support, uRPF, et. > al. Also, there's nothing in your list related specifically to IPv6, > required IPv6-IPv4 feature parity, and so forth. > > In the general performance range you specify, maybe the Catalyst 6800 > would be something to consider? > > But you can't develop a network architecture and determine your needs > based upon a laundry-list of general specs. It sounds as if you should > consider working with an experienced network architect and/or integrator to > help determine your actual requirements, first. > > He's baiting you to do his work for him. Those requirements are most for a tender that the company he's working for is looking to bid, but first they need to know what to bid :) Don't feed him. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
