On Friday, December 06, 2013 05:19:46 AM CiscoNSP List wrote: > Have a number of edge routers with customer prefixes + > full tables, and I only want to distribute customer > prefixes to other edge routers > > So, would I set community "AS:nnn" on the route map "in" > on our iptransit peering(For the full table prefixes), > and then deny them(community) on the route map "out" on > the iBGP peering to the edge routers?
Yes, communities are the best way to handle iBGP routing. Prefix lists and AS_PATH lists are better used across eBGP sessions, although nothing prevents you from using prefix lists on iBGP sessions (other than it doesn't scale). Cheers, Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
