Hi, On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 08:36:04PM +0000, Nick Hilliard wrote: > On 11/12/2013 19:16, Gert Doering wrote: > > I'm not particularily advocating "doing it all without BGP", but I do > > object to "it's in the textbook, thus everybody needs to do it that way!". > > note the first sentence of my last email: > > > I'll be the first to admit that not all this stuff is relevant to all > > networks. > > Please re-read until it sinks in :-)
I did see this. But it was missing in the mail where you advocated
putting BGP RRs into VMs :-)
(And I was stating this to make clear why *I* am protesting - and I've
seen too many people insist on "if it's not done the textbook way, it
must be wrong")
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [email protected]
fax: +49-89-35655025 [email protected]
pgp0H3LnpLHd_.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
