On Thursday, December 12, 2013 10:30:06 AM Adam Vitkovsky wrote: > And here I would object that with PIC-Core and PIC-Edge > BGP is as fast as OSPF/ISIS doing IP FRR.
I have seen extraordinary BGP performance in modern code in IOS and Junos, particularly in NG-MVPN scenarios where BGP is handling PIM messages. BGP PIC, Next Hop Addressing Tracking and Fast Fallover have all improved BGP performance to the point where it doesn't matter that much. Perhaps, some day, when I'm really lazy, I'll work on some empirical data for various scenarios. Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
