Mark, I agree with you. Sometimes I feel annoyed when I see IOS syntax changing without a clear roadmap. Maybe if Waris was around he could clarify the subjects.
Regards Andrea -----Original Message----- From: Mark Tinka [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: martedì 14 gennaio 2014 12:49 To: [email protected] Cc: Pasquino Andrea Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ME3600-ME3800: service-instance & bridge-domain syntax On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 12:05:51 PM Pasquino Andrea wrote: > what is the best practice for the configuration of L3VPN on Cisco > ME3XXX ? In this particular case, to be honest, I feel the old way is better because there are fewer configuration lines to have/host. You are defining the BD anyway, and the BD consumes a global VLAN (unlike the EVC) anyway. So unless there are some specific BD features that you want (which are only available/possible under the "bridge-domain" configuration heirarchy), I'd forego the extra typing. Just me... Mark. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
