Have not correcty described the setup:

(egress) Physical : Portchannel Switch port belonging to a WS_6724 card
(egress) Logical : SVI interface (802.1q encapsulation) for L3 termination

(ingress) Physical / Logical: Routed interface belonging to a ES+ card (no
802.1q encapsulation)

We see that traffic that is forwarded through the WS card has 802.1p = 0
regardless of dscp value
But If theout going interface is also in a ES+ card then the output 802.1p
corresponds to the packets DSCP value

In ES+ a L3 interface is Dscp tust, was mistaken earlier. Indeed this value
is retained (we see it in the corresponding
output packets of the WS card) but the derived 802.p =0. Need to find a way
to make this derived 802.1p value to
correspond to the packet's DSCP when the egress interface belongs to a
WS_67xx card





On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 11:43 PM, Victor Lyapunov
<[email protected]>wrote:

> Hello
>
> Have a question about 7609/RSP720 platform marking operation with mixed
> linecard types. In the setup we are testing uplinks are
> implemented in ES+ while customer facing interfaces in WS cards.
>
> The egress traffic is forwarded out of the WS cards through a Port-channel
> interface switchport with 802.1q encapsulation (SVI interface)
> We would like to be able to have the 802.1p values correspond to the DSCP
> of the ip packets.
>
> Normally for a WS_Card the 802.1p (CoS) value is generated based on the
> internal DSCP value of the packets (PFC based). I am not
> sure what is the case when the ingress interface belongs to an ES+ card?
> (Is an ES+ interface considered untrusted so internal
> dscp = 0 always?)
>
> Currently focused on mls qos commands to solve this but no luck so far. Is
> this course of action a dead end?
>
> Thanks for your help
>
>
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to