Cydon,

Your RRs should (must?) be fully meshed to meet IBGP requirements. The full 
mesh requirement is relaxed toward clients.
I believe the current best practice is assigning each RR its own cluster ID and 
having each client router peered with at least two RRs for redundancy. This set 
up results in the clients receiving two (or more) copies of the same route, 
something to keep in mind if your clients are carrying full Internet routes.

Depending on the size and configuration of your network a scenario like this 
might apply:

RR1/RR2 are assigned unique cluster IDs and are fully meshed.
Client A is peered RR1 and client B is peered with RR2.
RR1 and RR2 must be peered with one another (as non-clients) to exchange routes 
learned from clients A and B.
RR1 will reflect the routes from client B to client A.
RR2 will reflect the routes from client A to client B.

Without the RR/RR peering there is no way to propagate routes between clients A 
and B.
Peering both clients to both RRs that would solve the problem but is not 
scalable in a large network where there are many RRs and significant # of 
clients.

As always, ymmv.

Lee

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Cydon 
Satyr
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2014 1:02 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [c-nsp] Peering between route reflectors

Guys,
Could you help me clear this out.

Basically, if there are multiple route reflectors NOT in the forwarding path of 
the traffic, is there ANY reason to peer between them? I don't see a reason why 
they should peer, but I'd like to get this confirmed.

Also, if they are NOT in the forwarding path, regardless of whether they are 
peering between themselves or not, it shouldn't matter if they are all in the 
same CLUSTER, correct ?

I know the questions might look simple to you but I've seen designs where the 
questions pop out, and I'd like to be sure about this.

regards
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected] 
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to