Hi, On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 10:23:10PM +0200, Cydon Satyr wrote: > Agree, that could be the corner case, but how realistic would be to lose > TCP sessions to RR, without some underlying physical problem, on more than > one router, for example.
Your call :-) - that would be a reason to peer the RRs. I can't see
any other.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [email protected]
fax: +49-89-35655025 [email protected]
pgpyBnWmYkoYo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
