On Monday, April 07, 2014 09:01:33 PM Cydon Satyr wrote: > Basically, if there are multiple route reflectors NOT in > the forwarding path of the traffic, is there ANY reason > to peer between them? I don't see a reason why they > should peer, but I'd like to get this confirmed.
If you have several clusters of route reflectors serving different regions, they need to peer with one another otherwise how will one part of your network know about the other? The assumption here is that route reflector sessions to their clients are localized, and it does not make sense (or scale) to have every router have an iBGP session to every route reflector. Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
