On Monday, April 07, 2014 10:07:51 PM Cydon Satyr wrote: > Right so I think we all came to the same conclusion? > > Taking in consideration that all edge routers peer with > all RR (which I forgot to mention in original post) AND > none of them are in the forwarding path, THEN: > > 1) RR should not peer with each other > 2) The should all be in each separate cluster-id, > although it doesn't really matter
I will not say whether this is good or bad, as I have no practical experience with such a design, and what could happen. I'd certainly suggest testing this under several failure scenarios, if for nothing else, just to document the practice. Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
