Thanks Adam, bgp neighbors were up last friday when i was doing this. but since then i learned a few things...one thing was missing was I must have this on the neighbor statements in order to run rfc4761...
(under the l2vpn address family) ...ios... neighbor 10.10.10.1 suppress-signaling-protocol ldp ...ios xr... Signalling ldp disable http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/iproute_bgp/configuration/x e-3s/irg-xe-3s-book/irg-vpls-bgp-sig.html also i learned this about vpls rd's...Note: In the Cisco IOS and Cisco NX-OS software implementation, all the PE routers must have the same RD within the same VPLS domain. http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ios-nx-os-software/virtual-private -lan-services-vpls/116121-tech-vpls-bgp-00.html ...i've changed my configs a bit since friday... i'm testing a (3) site scenario, each site single homed, then later I'll try to backdoor connect site 2 and 3 with a layer 2 connection and cause a bad loop across what was site 2 and 3 then i'll try to fix it with the same ve-id trick spoken of in rfc4761 section 3.5 (Multi-homing and Path Selection) http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4761#section-3.5 Aaron p.s. does anyone know if the bgp graceful-restart is really necessary ? if so, why? From: Vitkovský Adam [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, April 28, 2014 2:37 AM To: Aaron; 'Waris Sagheer (waris)'; 'Nick Ryce'; [email protected]; 'Bruce Pinsky'; 'Caillin Bathern'; 'Damian Higgins'; 'Mohammad Khalil'; 'Daniel Hooper' Subject: RE: [c-nsp] BGP Signalled VPLS Hi Aaron, Do you see them talking bgp please? show ip bgp l2vpn vpls all The config looks good. adam From: Aaron [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, April 25, 2014 8:14 PM To: 'Waris Sagheer (waris)'; 'Nick Ryce'; [email protected]; 'Bruce Pinsky'; 'Caillin Bathern'; Vitkovský Adam; 'Damian Higgins'; 'Mohammad Khalil'; 'Daniel Hooper' Subject: RE: [c-nsp] BGP Signalled VPLS Hi all, what am I missing to get RFC4761 to work between these (2) me3600's ? (vpls w/bgp ad and w/bgp sig). 15.3(2)S2 on both mes. in short, i have the following on them... *** 3600-1 *** eng-lab-3600-1#sh run | sec l2vpn vfi context v45 l2vpn vfi context v45 vpn id 45 autodiscovery bgp signaling bgp ve id 1 ve range 11 rd 64512:451 route-target export 64512:45 route-target import 64512:45 *** 3600-2 *** eng-lab-3600-2#sh run | sec l2vpn vfi context v45 l2vpn vfi context v45 vpn id 45 autodiscovery bgp signaling bgp ve id 2 ve range 11 rd 64512:452 route-target export 64512:45 route-target import 64512:45 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- eng-lab-3600-1#sh l2vpn vfi name v45 Legend: RT=Route-target, S=Split-horizon, Y=Yes, N=No VFI name: v45, state: up, type: multipoint, signaling: BGP VPN ID: 45, VE-ID: 1, VE-SIZE: 11 RD: 64512:451, RT: 64512:45, 64512:45 Bridge-Domain 45 attachment circuits: Vlan45 Pseudo-port interface: pseudowire100020 Interface Peer Address VE-ID Local Label Remote Label S --------------------------------------------------------------------------- eng-lab-3600-2#sh l2vpn vfi name v45 Legend: RT=Route-target, S=Split-horizon, Y=Yes, N=No VFI name: v45, state: up, type: multipoint, signaling: BGP VPN ID: 45, VE-ID: 2, VE-SIZE: 11 RD: 64512:452, RT: 64512:45, 64512:45 Bridge-Domain 45 attachment circuits: Vlan45 Pseudo-port interface: pseudowire100015 Interface Peer Address VE-ID Local Label Remote Label S _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
