That shouldn't be true, unless something changed in the very latest software 
release. I've successfully used EPC on me3600x boxes quite a few times in the 
past.

My thoughts and words are my own.

Kind Regards,

Spyros

-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Lixfeld [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2014 5:02 PM
To: Spyros Kakaroukas
Cc: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ME3600 PW SPAN

I agree, but like any sort of remote SPAN, EPC is also not available on this 
platform, sadly and surprisingly.

Sent from my iPhone

> On May 2, 2014, at 9:27 AM, Spyros Kakaroukas <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>
> I've done something similar in the past without any issues. It's not really 
> convenient to do at scale though. Assuming you only want small situational 
> dumps for troubleshooting and not a permanent copy of your traffic , embedded 
> packet capture might serve you better.
>
> My thoughts and words are my own.
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> Spyros
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jason 
> Lixfeld
> Sent: Friday, May 02, 2014 4:16 PM
> To: <[email protected]>
> Subject: [c-nsp] ME3600 PW SPAN
>
> Seeing as how the ME3600 has no useful remote span capabilities, I just tried 
> to do a ghetto pseudowire span:
>
> 1. Connect a trunk port from some STP, PVST+ and CDP spewing test switch to 
> gi0/1 on local ME3600 2. Monitor source gi0/1 on local ME3600 3. Monitor 
> destination gi0/2 on local ME3600 4. Loop back gi0/2 to gi0/3 on local ME3600 
> 5. EoMPLS Xconnect gi0/3 on local ME3600 to gi0/4 on remote ME3600 6. Connect 
> wireshark box to gi0/4 of remote me3600
>
> At first glance, this seemed to work ok.  On the wireshark box, I was able to 
> see STP and PVST BPDUs on multiple VLANs and CDP frames.
>
> What else should I check to make sure this isn't some fluke?
>
> ... Or has this been a common workaround that has been known to work 
> perfectly since the dawn of time and I'm just late to the party?
>
> Sent from my iPhone
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected] 
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
>
> This e-mail and any attachment(s) contained within are confidential and are 
> intended only for the use of the individual to whom they are addressed. The 
> information contained in this communication may be privileged, or exempt from 
> disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you 
> are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this 
> communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication 
> in error, please notify the sender and delete the communication without 
> retaining any copies. Rolaware Hellas SA is not responsible for, nor 
> endorses, any opinion, recommendation, conclusion, solicitation, offer or 
> agreement or any information contained in this communication.


This e-mail and any attachment(s) contained within are confidential and are 
intended only for the use of the individual to whom they are addressed. The 
information contained in this communication may be privileged, or exempt from 
disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you 
are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this 
communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication 
in error, please notify the sender and delete the communication without 
retaining any copies. Rolaware Hellas SA is not responsible for, nor endorses, 
any opinion, recommendation, conclusion, solicitation, offer or agreement or 
any information contained in this communication.

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to