MX240 is too big however MX104 is exactly what I was talking about.

adam
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 2:38 PM
> To: Vitkovský Adam
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] why there are no plans for A903-RSP2B-240 please?????
> 
> > Really to get over 20K prefixes in HW with Metro-E+MPLS features we all
> are willing to install huge 10RU boxes almost as thick as high all around the
> place?
> > That just doesn't sound right.
> > Or does it?
> 
> Juniper MX240, 5U. But definitely more expensive than metro/switch class
> equipment.
> 
> I think Cisco, Juniper and others are afraid of destroying the nice profit
> margins on their higher end boxes. But maybe that's just me...
> 
> Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, [email protected]

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to