Feature set is C6K/C76K 15.1SY. Full MPLS L3VPN. Also VPLS. Waiting to see if PBB-EVPN arrives.
If deployed in pairs, redundant supervisor may not be an issue. I don't find ISSU and " stacking" to be very successful with most platforms. Ymmv. On Tuesday, July 22, 2014, Vitkovský Adam <[email protected]> wrote: > This C6880-X is a very interesting box, very powerful indeed. > > The only drawback is that it doesn’t have redundant RSP/Sup however it can > be stacked together. > > > > Would have to read through the documentation to find out about the MPLS > features’ availability. > > Though the data-sheet claims full MPLS/VPLS functionality. > > Since it is Sup-2T based it should have the same features as 7600 right? > > > > > > adam > > > > *From:* Tim Durack [mailto:[email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>] > *Sent:* Tuesday, July 22, 2014 3:54 PM > *To:* Vitkovský Adam > *Cc:* [email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>; > [email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> > *Subject:* Re: [c-nsp] why there are no plans for A903-RSP2B-240 > please????? > > > > May not have all of the SP features you need, but the C6880-X is an > interesting semi-fixed platform. > > > > On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 9:41 AM, Vitkovský Adam <[email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: > > > From: [email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> [mailto: > [email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>] > > Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 3:21 PM > > > > > > MX240 is too big however MX104 is exactly what I was talking about. > > > > MX104 is a very nice box, as long as you can live with its limited CPU > > horsepower. We'll be installing several of them soon. > > > > Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, [email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> > > Well I'm pretty annoyed by the asr903 limited CPU horsepower. > Reloading the box takes ages also saving config introduces a very 90's > style delay. > > Does MX104 support LFA or rLFA please? > > adam > > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > > > > > -- > Tim:> > -- Tim:> _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
