I'm now filtering the full tables on these routers. In this situation,
would those outputs still be relevant?

On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 5:59 PM, Antonio Soares <[email protected]> wrote:
> Can you share these outputs from both routers ?
>
> "show cef fib"
> "show cef table"
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
> [email protected]
> http://www.ccie18473.net
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
> Gabriel
> Sent: terça-feira, 12 de Agosto de 2014 14:36
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR1001 RAM
>
> Hi,
>
> we have 2 ASR1001 in one location. They each receive a full table from 
> different providers and have an iBGP session between them. One of them 
> generated this message today:
>
> *Aug 11 23:11:16.983: %FIB-2-FIBDOWN: CEF has been disabled due to a low 
> memory condition. It can be re-enabled by configuring "ip cef [distributed]"
>
> For some reason, it only saw 500k prefixes today (I'm assuming the provider 
> is doing some aggregation before sending the full table?).
> I had to put some filtering in place and then re-enabled CEF. IOS-XE version 
> is 3.07.01.S.152-4.S1
>
> We have the exact same setup in another location (with different ISPs). The 
> only difference is the IOS-XE version: 3.06.00.S.152-2.S. I saw one of these 
> exceed 500k and there were no error messages whatsoever.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 9:35 PM, Rich Lewis <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Those memory figures below are from an ASR1001 running IOS-XE 03.09.00.S / 
>> 15.3(2)S.
>>
>> What was the image that you ran into memory issues with? Just so I
>> know to avoid it! :-)
>>
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Gustav UHLANDER [mailto:[email protected]]
>>> Sent: 09 August 2014 23:33
>>>
>>> Yea that depends on sw version.
>>> We ran into the issue when upgrading to a newer image on routers that
>>> receive full feeds from upstream.
>>> Sent it to tac and they said it was memory issue.
>>>
>>> Skickas med OWA för iPad
>>> ________________________________________
>>>> Från: cisco-nsp <[email protected]> för Rich Lewis
>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>> Skickat: den 6 augusti 2014 21:30:55
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> FWIW, we have full tables on an ASR1001 with 4GB RAM, and with
>>>> add-path
>>>> enabled:
>>>>
>>>> 503890 network entries using 124964720 bytes of memory
>>>> 982424 path entries using 110031488 bytes of memory BGP using
>>>> 281251490 total bytes of memory
>>>>
>>>> I guess it depends what else you're doing, but 4GB would seem ample
>>>> on the face of it.
>>
>>
>> **********************************************************************
>>
>> Satellite Information Services Limited. Registered Office: Whitehall
>> Avenue, Kingston, Milton Keynes, Buckinghamshire, MK10 0AX. Company
>> No. 4243307
>>
>> The information in this email (which includes any files transmitted with it) 
>> is confidential and is intended for the addressee only. Unauthorized 
>> recipients are required to maintain confidentiality. If you have received 
>> this email in error please notify the sender immediately, destroy any copies 
>> and delete it from your computer system.
>>
>> **********************************************************************
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected] 
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to