As far as i know less than 2000 server and 20% of those are physical. 

Not sure of amogeneous os on those..



Sent with Mobile 

-------- Messaggio originale --------
Da: Andrew Miehs <[email protected]> 
Data:  
A: dim0sal <[email protected]> 
Cc: [email protected] 
Oggetto: Re: R: Re: [c-nsp] Best design can fit DC to DC 
 
How many physical servers? What operating system/ virtualisation environment?

Sent from a mobile device

> On 1 Nov 2014, at 17:50, dim0sal <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi andrew
> Indeed i wrote stp isolation, that means to keep stp inside each dc.
> 
> I m wondering since otv is not ieee if i got it well...
> 
> So which is your suggestion for the lan and wan devices?
> 
> Wan i understand 6800 or n7k ?
> Lan?
> 
> Rgds
> 
> Sent with Mobile  
> 
> 
> -------- Messaggio originale --------
> Da: Andrew Miehs <[email protected]> 
> Data: 
> A: R LAS <[email protected]> 
> Cc: [email protected] 
> Oggetto: Re: [c-nsp] Best design can fit DC to DC 
> 
> 
> Dont know if you really want l2 spanning across 35km...
> 
> The qfx5100s are an extremely cost effective solution.
> 
> If you want mpls you would need c6800s or n7ks possibly using otv - this will 
> become very pricey very quickly...
> 
> Sent from a mobile device
> 
> > On 1 Nov 2014, at 3:43, R LAS <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 
> > Hi all
> > a customer of mine is thinking to renew DC infrastructure and 
> > interconnection among the main (DC1) and secondary (DC2), with the 
> > possibility in the future to add another (DC3).
> > 
> > Main goal are: sub-second convergence in case of a single fault of any 
> > component among DC1 and DC2 (not DC3), to have the possibility to extend L2 
> > and L3 among DCs, to provide STP isolation among DCs, to provide ports on 
> > the server at eth 1/10Gbs speed.
> > 
> > DC1 and DC2 are 35 km away, DC3 around 1000 km away from DC1 and DC2.
> > 
> > Customer would like to design using Cisco or Juniper and at the end to 
> > decide.
> > 
> > Talking about Juniper my idea was to build and MPLS interconnection with 
> > MX240 or MX104 in VC among DC1 and DC2 (tomorrow will be easy to add DC3) 
> > and to use QFX in a virtual chassis fabric configuration.
> > 
> > And if you would go with Cisco, what do you propose in this scenario ?
> > 
> > Rgds                         
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to