Hi Simon can you detail more "ASR9k can be more flexible on EoMPLS (VPLS) than 6807" ?
Regards > Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 10:26:55 +0000 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > CC: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR vs 6807 > > On Thu Nov 27, 2014 at 10:18:41AM +0000, R LAS wrote: > > Discussing a new architecture of DCI (Data Center Interconnection), Cisco > > raccomends both ASR9k and 6807. The architecture requested by the customer > > forecast MPLS/VPLS supported by DCI. > > > > From pricing point of view there is a quite big difference (win 6807), from > > feature point of view Cisco says the difference is "only" the number of > > mac-addresses supported and the sw modularity. > > > > Can anybody help in digging more the "technical" difference ? > > I'm going through much the same at the moment, and settling on 6807, largely > from a price perspective. > > ASR9k is (today) a more capable box for routing - particularly if you want > higher bandwidths. ASR9k has 100G ports today. 6807 only has 40G. ASR9k can > be more flexible on EoMPLS (VPLS) than 6807. > > 6807 has a lot of potential (880G per slot), but it's not supported by either > Supervisors or Linecards that are available today (current limit is 80G/slot). > > Simon _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
