Thanks for all the replies - Much appreciated.
> From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 07:41:27 +1100 > Subject: [c-nsp] ospf (passive-interface default) > > Hi Everyone, > > Dont have a lab handy to test this, so hoping someone can answer: > > If you configure: > > router ospf 1 > network 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.3 area 1 > > without passive-int default, will ospf be "enabled" on all Interfaces, or > just the Interface with 10.10.10.0/30 configured on it? > > I was always under the impression that (best practice) is to do the > following, so that ospf is disabled on all ints, apart from the ones > configured with "no passive int foo" > > router ospf 1 > passive-int default > no passive int gi0/1 > network 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.3 area 1 > > ...and, (As an alternative) is configuring ospf under each interface now a > method many use instead of the above example? > > ...I havent tried the "per int" method (I will later today), but in theory, I > think having all the config under "router ospf xx" would be easier to > maintain...i.e. all the config is in the one section for ospf? > > Cheers. > > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
