On Tue, 10 Mar 2015, Mark Tinka wrote:
On 10/Mar/15 19:24, Nick Hilliard wrote:
then, your provider is lying.
Well, the provider may not be lying about their "max-prefix range", whatever
that means. But certainly, the OP wants to start considering other providers.
I've seen people get confused as to what the "values" following
maximum-prefix mean, so it's possible the person the OP talked to was a
jr. NOC worker and misread the config thinking the warning % threshold was
the top end value for the max-prefixes.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jon Lewis, MCP :) | I route
| therefore you are
_________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
