Hi, On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 10:11:26PM +0200, Mark Tinka wrote: > On 10/Mar/15 19:24, Nick Hilliard wrote: > >then, your provider is lying. > > Well, the provider may not be lying about their "max-prefix range", > whatever that means. But certainly, the OP wants to start considering > other providers.
Indeed. In that part of the hierarchy, the upstream provider should
filter by prefix list (IRR data) and not just max-pfx "I take everything
as long as it's not too many prefixes (but I won't tell you the limit)".
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [email protected]
fax: +49-89-35655025 [email protected]
pgp3vtDstrKX_.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
