Hi, On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 12:53:36PM +0000, Scott Granados wrote: > +1 for using a routing protocol. BGP with a private AS is a decent fit here.
The main reason we like EIGRP here is "less config, and faster failover",
as compared to BGP :-) (BGP+BFD wins, of course, but I've yet to see a
customer router/gateway device that is able to do that)
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [email protected]
fax: +49-89-35655025 [email protected]
pgpPmnlS4UZta.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
