On 14/Apr/15 16:27, Tassos Chatzithomaoglou via cisco-nsp wrote: > We have been fighting with Cisco for this (L2VPN PW load balancing) for a > long time. > Besides a good (which could have been much better) level of support on the > ASR9k, it's a shame that all other new equipment doesn't even support FAT or > any other good alternative. > PS: As a temporary workaround, we have increased the number of PWs accross > the network.
Juniper support this in current code. Use them to get what you want from Cisco - or better yet, just use them. Mark. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
