On 15/04/2015 07:42, Mark Tinka wrote: > On 14/Apr/15 18:27, Nick Hilliard wrote: >> What platform though? This problem is massively platform specific and the >> ability to implement PE entropy labels or do deep packet lookups for >> lag/ecmp load balancing will depend entirely on the chipset capabilities. > > MX on Trio.
right, both trio and asr9k can do lag/ecmp balancing based on payload inspection to some degree, but it's complicated and hacky. There's a discussion of asr9k in the Cisco support forums: > https://supportforums.cisco.com/document/111291/asr9000xr-loadbalancing-architecture-and-characteristics If possible, the best way to handle this problem is to use FAT-PW on the PE. If this isn't possible, then there are limits to what can be done by P routers. I don't know how the crs platform handles this, which is what the OP was interested in. Nick _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
