On 5/May/15 14:52, Phil Mayers wrote: > > > Yes. I can't remember where, but I have the impression either the CSR > or vMX had oddly high forwarding latency, even accounting for the fact > it's "just software".
Right - I can't recall whether it was on c-nsp or NANOG, but I think the issue was that someone was saying that using CSR1000v as an IP SLA probe had some internal forwarding latency issues, compared to a classic software-based router like a 2800, 3800 or 7200. I can't speak to how true this is. Our CSR1000v's are RR-only, and do not forward any traffic. Handling of exception traffic has been great with no issues so far, which would imply - at least for me, anyway - that it should be fine as an IP SLA probe since the box terminates that type of traffic, it does not transit it. Not sure whether the issue could be related to hardware, choice of hypervisor, e.t.c. Mark. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
