Hi Gert,

>

        Adam Vitkovsky
        IP Engineer

T:      0333 006 5936
E:      [email protected]
W:      www.gamma.co.uk

This is an email from Gamma Telecom Ltd, trading as “Gamma”. The contents of 
this email are confidential to the ordinary user of the email address to which 
it was addressed. This email is not intended to create any legal relationship. 
No one else may place any reliance upon it, or copy or forward all or any of it 
in any form (unless otherwise notified). If you receive this email in error, 
please accept our apologies, we would be obliged if you would telephone our 
postmaster on +44 (0) 808 178 9652 or email [email protected]

Gamma Telecom Limited, a company incorporated in England and Wales, with 
limited liability, with registered number 04340834, and whose registered office 
is at 5 Fleet Place London EC4M 7RD and whose principal place of business is at 
Kings House, Kings Road West, Newbury, Berkshire, RG14 5BY.


-----Original Message-----
> From: Gert Doering [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: 11 August 2015 11:17
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 09:43:47AM +0000, Adam Vitkovsky wrote:
> > IPV4_FRAG_TUNNEL                                          Punt     Not 
> > implemented by
> ucode
> > -this one actually concerns me
> > -does it mean it's going to be slow, or punted to RP, or just dropped
> > -not sure what I should make up from this
>
> Indeed... "it might be implemented eventually, but today it isn't, so
> if you turn it on, your packets will be destroyed in creative ways" :-)
>
> But I'm relieved that it's not only me who can't find a formal word on this.
>
> gert
>
It might be worth submitting question type TAC case.
XR folks are great and will be able to dig out some info on this.

Or you can contact "Alexander the great" via one of his posts.

adam
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to