> On Tue, 11 Aug 2015, Gert Doering wrote: > > > Indeed... "it might be implemented eventually, but today it isn't, so > > if you turn it on, your packets will be destroyed in creative ways" :-) > > > > But I'm relieved that it's not only me who can't find a formal word on this. > > With the kind of router that ASR9k is, you most likely find it under > support if it works ok, otherwise it's not mentioned at all. > > Re-assembly of fragmented packets is typically something that routers do > not do. As soon as you need to keep state across packets you need a fairly > differently engineered device.
OK, I agree - so what sort of device would that be, if one were to go look for one? (I can think of a few use cases I might have for it, but I have yet to see a box that can handle it.) -bacon _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
