There were some discussions on here a few weeks/months back about some best practices for running these devices.
Mostly folks were using these for Route reflectors I think. -----Original Message----- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Roland Dobbins Sent: 13 August 2015 13:00 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [c-nsp] CSR1000V and CPU usage On 13 Aug 2015, at 18:30, Robert Hass wrote: > Everyone know that it's faster but not everybody needs so huge performance. Until it gets packeted. ----------------------------------- Roland Dobbins <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
