Hi, The bandwidth is assessed as a sum on ingress: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/routers/csr1000/software/configuration/csr1000Vswcfg/licensing.html#pgfId-997645
My unscientific experiments seem to indicate that the control plane traffic is probably not counted towards the licensed bandwidth. For example - if we drop all licences (default is then 100kb/s max) then router keeps all adjacencies (BGP, OSPF, LDP even BFD) but forwarded traffic gets dropped. I haven't investigated this further, so it's also possible that QoS is helping the adjacencies to stay up. kind regards Pshem On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 at 02:35 Steve Glendinning <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Mostly folks were using these for Route reflectors I think. > > > > That's what we do. Works like a charm, over 12x months now. > > In this application how low bandwidth license can you get away with in > practice? Do the bandwidth license limits apply to both routed > traffic and control-plane traffic (such as RR BGP updates)? > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
