On 16/Nov/15 12:27, Sigurbjörn Birkir Lárusson wrote:
> No idea on the interoperability but technology wise I'd rule out Draft-Rosen > if you can. > > It's often forgotten for recent Cisco stuff or implemented as an afterthought > (the ASR903 RSP-2/ASR920 being a perfect example of this, no Draft-Rosen > support as of now, RSP-1 Draft-Rosen for the 903 also took a fair amount of > time to stabilise and sometimes was broken in patch releases), it doesn't > always play nicely (we've had many issues with it on the 7600, including > duplicate streams) and it's the most architecturally unsound service of the > MVPN solution out there, in terms of traffic distribution, efficiency and > redundancy. Agree, stay away from Rosen. Very complex. NG-MVPN is the way to go. The IETF have BIER in the works, but that's nowhere near ready for production. Mark. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
