Mark That is a valid point but the company I work for already only uses Cisco for its routing/switching devices. So it's also a non-issue.
Tom -----Original Message----- From: Mark Tinka [mailto:mark.ti...@seacom.mu] Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 11:56 To: Tom Marcoen; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ME3800X/ME3600X/ME3600X-24CX/ASR903/ASR901 Deployment Simplification Feedback On 17/Nov/15 12:49, Tom Marcoen wrote: > We're currently also using ASR9010 as core routers with ME3600X as the access > "switches" but are now looking at replacing the ME3600X with ASR9000v > extension shelfs. Does anyone have any experience with this setup? > > At first side it looks nice and (a bit) cheaper but I noticed the ASR9000v > comes with 11-port increment licenses and does not have a redundant power > supply. This last issue is show-stopper for us. > > Anyway, I would like to hear your views on the matter. Satellites lock you into vendor gear. Primary reason I stay away from satellites. Mark. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
