Even not considering vendor-lock you will have less options from said supplier if you expect to use this as a universal solution.
The ASR920 series has many variants, I am capitalizing on this for our topology. There will always, I find, be the Odd ball requirement that makes these kind of things impossible. Staying flexible is always a good approach. tis 17 nov. 2015 kl 12:06 skrev Mark Tinka <[email protected]>: > > > On 17/Nov/15 13:00, Tom Marcoen wrote: > > > Mark > > > > That is a valid point but the company I work for already only uses Cisco > for its routing/switching devices. So it's also a non-issue. > > Fair enough, then. > > The other point, for me, is making sure easy ring topologies you would > build on the ME3600X/ASR920 using IP/MPLS can be replicated using > satellites. There will be a temptation not to build satellites as > point-to-point, but rather, as rings, and you don't want to find > yourself caught out. > > Make sure you test and verify your ultimate Access topology before you > buy, as satellites do not typically run IP/MPLS. > > Mark. > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
