On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 12:12:12PM -0500, Justin M. Streiner wrote: > > Kind of surprising. Thinking of the Nexus world, all Ethernet interfaces > are named "Ethernet....." regardless of speed.
Yea, that's one thing I really despise about Nexus. Seeing EthX/Y is really boring (must be a cheap data center port thing). There's just something appealing about seeing spelled out interface names for different speeds, especially when they get more expensive (HundredGigE on ASR9K) :-o > It seems like other > vendors are moving in this direction as well, such as Juniper with 100G > interfaces on MX platforms. I don't particularly have issues with Juniper's "et-" naming, because it's only used for high-capacity links (25/40/50/100GE) so there's differenciation there. It's pretty much given that most networks that rolling et- in the core is pretty much running 100GE. BTW, can anybody confirm if NCS 5001 can do RSVP-TE (as a P router) well? I'd presume it shouldn't have any issues with it, but the datasheet only lists LDP. I'm thinking this could be a good replacement for QFX 5k to do lightweight LSR in the metro/dc access. James _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
