On 23 March 2016 at 13:20, Sebastian Beutel <[email protected]> wrote:
> That's why i am asking myself whether udld is a residue that nowadays > causes more harm than it prevents and should therefore not be used anymore. > At least on gigabit and faster links and if there are no really dumb > media converters involved. > > What do you think? I couldn't agree more, as long as you have hardware liveliness detection and unidirectional link detection like you have on Ethernet, UDLD will just decrease your availability not increase. As it's control-plane feature and on timely transport of BPDU. Ethernet has RFI or remote-fault-indicator, it can assert when it sees line down, then on unidirectional link far end will get this RFI and go down also. -- ++ytti _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
