On 23 March 2016 at 15:16, Phil Mayers <[email protected]> wrote: > I disagree. We ran UDLD on 6500 for 5+ years, and it caused way more > problems (particularly due to false-positives) than it solved. > > We ripped it out, and I've no cause to question that decision.
Particularly annoying is that you can't MLS ratelimit BPDU if you run UDLD, so you expose yourself to plethora of control-plane congestion vectors. But if you already MUST run STP, then this option is gone anyhow, then it's not that bad. But if BPDU is only reason to accept BPDU, then it certainly is going to cause more pain than solve. -- ++ytti _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
