Ive got some ASR1006's with RP1/SIP10....purchased years ago, and they do the job, but If buying one now, Id def go RP2...writing conf, sh commands(Both can be horribly slow vs RP2), flexibility to add more ram, bigger/newer SIPs/ESPs etc....more $, but worth it imo.
________________________________ From: cisco-nsp <[email protected]> on behalf of Curtis Piehler <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, 5 June 2016 6:17 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [c-nsp] ASR1000 RP1 vs RP2 I see the main difference between the two is the 32 bit OS vs a 64 bit and 1.5 single core vs a 2.2 dual core. Yes the memory is increased and hard drive space. If a 1006 will be used for some DS1 and Ethernet termination would an RP1 be enough? I could also do with an ESP20 and SIP10s since they allow for 2:1 oversubscription and do not think I will hit the 2:1 in the foreseeable near future. As far as network services: BFD on selective peers BGP on above selective peers Three copies of the Internet routing table (one from each route reflector) Some QOS Curtis _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp cisco-nsp Info Page - puck.nether.net<https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp> puck.nether.net To see the collection of prior postings to the list, visit the cisco-nsp Archives. Using cisco-nsp: To post a message to all the list members, send ... archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
