On 11/Aug/16 20:31, Peter Rathlev wrote:
> Thank you Michalis and Fredrik, this was just the info I needed. It > sounds like we can get this to work. :-) > > We would love to start using NG-MVPN, Mark and others have presented > compelling arguments several times on this list. Is there by chance any > way of making these two work together? Could a device that supports > both Rosen and NG-MVPN function as a kind of gateway between the two? > > And is there a transition path to NG-MVPN that does not require a fork- > lift reconfiguration? I tried searching "teh intarweb" but I suspect > I'm not using the correct search terms. In 2011, Juniper proposed an architecture to interwork Rosen and NG-MVPN deployments. I'm happy to unicast the document to you if you like. On the migration, Juniper proposed an architecture to cleanly transition a network from Rosen to NG-MVPN. The talk was given by Emil Gagala at PLNOG in Warsaw in 2010. You can find the link here: http://data.proidea.org.pl/plnog/4edycja/materialy/prezentacje/ng_mvpn_plnog.pdf Of course, these are all Juniper solutions, purely because they were the leading vendor pushing NG-MVPN back then. You'd have to map this to your Cisco network accordingly. Mark. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
