Thanks very much Saku - Ive googled, but not found anything confirming...but ttl sec check under ospf, would it cause any issues with rLFA/FRR...i.e dynamic creation of tunnels?
Cheers. ________________________________ From: Saku Ytti <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, 25 May 2017 7:23 PM To: CiscoNSP List Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Best practise/security design for BGP and OSPF On 25 May 2017 at 05:25, CiscoNSP List <[email protected]> wrote: Hey, > but not XE? Regarding TTL....(In both OSPF and BGP)....hop count can be > arbitrary, if we encounter a link failure...do we just use worse case In iBGP yes, in eBGP and OSPF usually no. Typical design guarantees eBGP and OSPF to be on-link or down. -- ++ytti _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
